FEATURES Big Deals
With more multiagency contracts breaking the $20 billion barrier, 2006 might bring some of the biggest deals ever.
Speed, organization and efficiency are the top goals for agencies developing and awarding major technology contracts in fiscal 2006.
With federal agencies projected to spend $76 billion on information technology and staff in fiscal 2006, one of the most notable trends in contracting is a continued push for faster awards, achieved in many cases through multiple-award contracts such as governmentwide acquisition contracts (GWAC) and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) deals. At least $64 billion in federal IT spending is expected to go to private sector suppliers, according to Reston, Va.-based consultants INPUT.
The push for speed is rooted in simple economics. As the government is asked to do more with less, it has trimmed its workforce - including its procurement and acquisition staff. The Homeland Security Department has only 20 certified program managers handling programs worth $100 million or more, for example.
DHS has implemented the Enterprise Solutions Office, a joint program under the new Information Technology Acquisition Center designed to provide centralized management with decentralized ordering capabilities for contracts, including the Enterprise Acquisition Gateway for Leading Edge solutions, a multiaward IDIQ information technology services deal, and First Source, a similar contract for IT commodities.
But perhaps most significant is the trend of multibillion- dollar contracts, the largest this year being Alliant, a GWAC worth up to $50 billion. The move toward massive contracts is a natural progression for federal contracting and a reflection of what is happening in the IT world as technology solutions become more complex and difficult to integrate and include multiple technologies. Expect to see more of these huge contracts in the future.
A growing reliance on multiple-award contracts also reflects government's desire to consolidate and combine repetitive or redundant systems and contracts.
Fiscal 2006 also will see agencies placing more of the onus on the bidder in requests for proposals by replacing statements of work with statements of objectives, which require vendors to propose more comprehensive solutions. To some degree, this is the result of having fewer experts and program managers available to draft complex work statements, but it's also a sign that government wants to pass on more of the risk to industry.
Finally, fiscal 2006 could be something of a watershed for small businesses as agencies focus on ensuring that small companies have more opportunity to bid on and win contracts. Many of the major contracts to be let in 2006 strongly encourage small business participation. In addition, all governmentwide IT contracts will have small business set-asides, notes Darren Bezdek, manager of subcontracting opportunities at INPUT.
Post a Comment
To post a comment, you must provide a name and a valid e-mail address. Messages must be limited to 400 words. By using this Service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although Government Executive does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.